Keloid is NOT a surgical disorder. Indeed, a large number of patients experience worsening of their keloids after surgery. This is simply due to the fact that Keloid is a genetic disorder of the skin, and the genetic abnormality that results in formation of a particular keloid lesion, not only is present at the site of keloid formation, it is also present in most other parts of the individual’s skin who is affected by this condition. The injury caused by the surgical scalpel to remove a keloid, on its own results in formation of a much larger keloid.
Although there are cases whereby surgery has helped some patient, unfortunately, there are way too many cases whose keloids have significantly worsened after surgery, causing them tremendous distress.
KELOID is a very hard to treat fibro-proliferative DISORDER of cutaneous connective tissue secondary to dysregulation in various skin repair and healing processes in individuals who are genetically susceptible to this disorder. Although reported in individuals from almost all ethnic backgrounds, the disorder is more common among two distinct and genetically distant populations; Africans / African Americans and Asians. The only groups of individuals who may be spared from developing keloids are albinos, making the case for a relationship between melanin production and susceptibility to keloid formation at least among dark-skinned individuals. Keloid Disorder has a very diverse phenotype (clinical appearance) and can present itself either as a single small spot on the skin of the affected individual, or often involving several areas of the skin. In some patients, keloid lesions can grow and form a large size skin tumor. From the onset of development, patients’ keloids follow variable clinical courses. Some patients develop only one keloid and that keloid reaches a particular size and it stops growing further. There are also patients who start with one keloid, however, very soon they develop their second, third, fourth and before they know, they have far too many keloids to count. Although keloid disorder has been known for centuries, it is one the most under-researched and poorly understood human medical conditions; and for the most part neglected by the medial research community. This has resulted in our current lack of understanding of various aspects of this disorder, from its genetics, to its epidemiology, from it pathophysiology, to its treatment; and even proper terminology for it. All and all, we live in dark ages of research and treatment for this disorder with very little to offer to hundreds of millions of people who suffer from this disorder.Due to this lack of interest in the disorder and paucity of research, much of what is discussed, or even written and published about keloid disorder is based on hard evidence. Most importantly, this applies to treatment options and long term outcome of these interventions.
Lack of understanding of the disorder even reflects itself in terminology used to describe this illness. Terms such as “keloid scarring” or “keloid scars” that are commonly used, even by those who treat keloid patients. These terms do not properly describe this disorder, and erroneously apply a lesser importance to this genetic skin disorder. A genetic condition that results in formation of large skin tumors, or itching, pain and burning sensation, a condition that disables certain patients, and covers 20-30% of their skin, a condition that some treat it with radiation therapy, is not a condition of “skin scarring”. It is indeed a true skin disorder.Even most reputable public references also lack sound medical advice for keloid patients. NIH (National Institute of Health) webpage about keloid states that “Keloids often do not need treatment.”Obviously the author of this page does not suffer from keloid himself, otherwise such an incorrect statement would not be posted on their webpage. Not a single keloid patient would feel comfortable leaving his or her disease un-treated.
Term “Keloid Disorder” applies to the disease entity itself, encompassing the whole aspect and various clinical presentation of the disorder.Term “Keloid” is used interchangeably to describe the disease entity, or to refer to the individual keloid lesion.Terms “Keloid Lesion” or “Keloidal Lesion” describe the actual skin lesions that is seen.Term “Keloid Patient” is used to define an individual patient who is suffering from keloid disorder.Term “Acne Keloidalis” of “Acne Keloidalis Nuchae” was described as a unique entity in 1800, to define the type of keloid disorder that presents itself in the occipital scalp or upper posterior neck. This entity is almost exclusively in Africans/African-American men.Term “Keloid Scar” or “Keloid Scarring” is an erroneous term, which is simply misleading, meaningless and non-descriptive of this medical condition and should not be used.
Keloid disorder has a fascinating and very diverse phenotype. The disorder can present itself either as a single small spot on the skin of the affected individual, or it can involve several areas of the skin. In some cases, presentation is limited to one or a few small lesions of the skin, either round or linear; in other cases, keloid lesions can appear as large nodules, a conglomerate of nodules, massive skin tumors, or as very large keloid patches. Although benign, keloid can cause major aesthetic, and at time functional problems, all of which pose significant negative impact on the individual’s quality of the life.Keloid disorder is characterized by excessive collagen and/or glycoprotein deposits in the dermis [[dermis]]. There is, however, void of knowledge as to why in some case the keloid lesions are limited to one area of their skin, or they take on particular shapes and forms.In addition to having keloid lesion on the skin, some keloid patients also suffer from pruritus (itching) and burning sensation or pain at the site of their keloids. These symptoms are common among those who have chest wall keloids.
Morphological Classification of Keloids
Keloid lesions take on a variety of shapes and forms, and appear in any part of the skin. The lesions can be classified according to their appearance.”Keloidal Papules” refers to a small, and often newly formed keloid lesions. These lesions are solid, raised above the level of skin and have distinct borders and measure from few millimeters up to one centimeter in diameter. All keloids start with a small papule. In rare patients, keloid lesions can be very few in number, and very small in size. This patters is often encountered in the upper chest area.”Nodular Keloid” lesions appear round, are raised from the surface of the skin, and often feel like a hard lump in skin, appearing as half of a sphere with a broad base. These lesions are solid, round or oval, raised above the level of skin and have distinct borders and measure from 1-2 centimeter in diameter.The Keloid nodule remains round with a glossy surface and as it grows, it maintains its round appearance unless it transforms into a keloid tumor, or massive keloid, when it loses its round appearance. Nodular Keloids are commonly seen in Africans/ African Americans or individual with black skin color.”Keloid Tumors” refer to any keloid nodule that grows to a diameter of greater than two centimeters.”Linear Keloid” appear like a line that can run in any direction on the skin, and over time can expand in size.”Flat Keloid – Keloidal Plaque:” refer to the type of lesion that tend to spread sideways, as opposed to raising from the skin surface. Flat keloids grow and spread on the surface of the skin and hardly form a nodule. This is the most common form of keloid seen in Caucasians and individuals with light and fair skin color.”Butterfly Keloid” refer to the keloids that their appearance is similar to butterfly. These keloid grow from their sides and as they grow sideways, their wings spread wider. Butterfly keloids often form in central chest area, over sternum.”Guttate Keloid” refers to a unique pattern of presentation of Keloid disorder whereby the affected individual has numerous round and small keloid spots, which are often clustered in one area of the skin. This pattern of keloid lesions mimics the pattern of guttate psoriasis, with the difference being the lesions are keloidal in nature.”Hyper-inflammatory Keloids” refer to keloids that are extremely painful and tender to touch. This type of keloid is often times seen in central chest area, and takes a butterfly shape. Pain and discomfort of this type of keloid is often very hard to manage.”Superficially Spreading Keloids” are those keloids that have a rather rapid rate of growth and spread and involve very large areas of the skin. Often adjacent keloids merge and form of a much larger keloid.”Pedunculated Keloid” is a keloid lesion that grows like a mushroom, with a stalk connecting the bulk of keloid to the underlying skin. This type of keloid is often seen in earlobes.”Bulky Keloids” are either a conglomerate of several keloid nodules that have merged with each other, or are due to a overgrowth of a single nodule that continues to increase in size. Bulky keloids measure between 5-10 centimeters in diameter and almost always interfere with daily life of the affected person. These keloids are often noticeable under thin clothing. They can be irritated, or pulled during sleep when the person tosses and turn in bed, waking the person up with pain from pulling of the keloid lesions. Bulky keloids can develop in any part of the skin, including on the face. Surgical removal of small keloids often results in formation of bulky keloids.”Massive Keloids” are those that are quite bulky, measuring over 10 centimeters in diameter, and by their nature see no boundaries and will spread in all directions never stop growing. Continuous growth of a keloid, which is often times worsened by surgical removal of an existing keloid, leads to formation of massive. Massive keloids are almost unique to Africans, African Americans and individuals with black skin color and always interfere with person’s daily life, and even range of motion of the joints in the involved area.
Topographical Classification of Keloids
Keloid lesions can form in unique and well defined part of the skin; and in each part, the keloid lesions can display a unique shape and form.”Scalp Keloids” often form in the occipital area and are common among individuals with black color skin. “Ear Keloids” form on the ears, almost always at the site of a prior piercing of the ear. “Earlobe keloids” appear as a ball of tissue growing on one or both sides of the earlobes.”Posterior Auricular Keloids” are those that form behind the ears, and often develop following surgery in this area.”Facial Keloids” appear as either flat lines or nodules on the face. This condition is common among as well as Asians.”Neck Keloids” appear often as a liner or nodular keloids. Over time these keloids grow to larger sizes. Neck keloids are more commonly seen among Africans/African Americans and those with black color skin.”Chest Wall Keloids” consist of keloids that occur on the chest, often over sternum. Upper chest wall, including the shoulder areas, is the most prevalent location for keloid formation.”Pubic Keloids” develop in pubic area, most commonly seen among Africans/African Americans and those with black color skin whereby the disease can results in formation of bulky, or massive keloids. Pubic keloids is also seen among Asians, but it is almost always a flat and small lesions.
Like all other aspects of Keloid Disorder, epidemiology of this disorder, its true incidence and prevalence has never been properly studied. True incidence and prevalence of keloid in Unites States is not known. Indeed, there has never been a population study to assess the epidemiology of this disorder. In his 2001 publication, Dr. Marneros stated that “reported incidence of keloids in the general population ranges from a high of 16% among the adults in Zaire to a low of 0.09% in England”, quoting from Bloom”s 1956 publication on heredity of keloids. We do however know, from clinical observations that the disorder is more common among Africans, African Americans and Asians with unreliable and very wide estimated prevalence rates ranging from 4.5-16% . Thorough and scientific population and epidemiology studies of this disorder are desperately needed.Center for Disease Control (CDC) does not follow this disorder, therefore we have no reliable indication as to its incidence or prevalence in United States. World Health Organization (WHO) does not follow this disorder either. Keloid Disorder is quite common in sub-Saharan Africa.A recent report from Tunisia on over 27,000 dermatology clinic visit was published [R12] without mentioning Keloid. It is hard to believe that there is a country on earth, let alone in North Africa, where keloid does not exist as a disease entity.
Most patients, especially Africans and African Americans have a positive family history of keloid disorder. Development of keloids among twins also lends credibility to existence of a genetic susceptibility to develop keloids. Dr. Maneros et al. reported four sets of identical twins with keloids; Ramakrishnan et al. also described a pair of twins who developed keloids at the same time after vaccination. Case series have reported clinically severe forms of keloids in individuals with a positive family history and black African ethnic origin.Genetic basis of keloid disorder is poorly understood and is an area that has not been properly researched. While the mode of inheritance of keloid disorder in not known, several theories have been proposed, including autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant with incomplete penetrance and variable expression. Such a diverse phenotype is most likely associated with a complex and multigene inheritance with deletion or non-deletion single point mutations in more than one gene. Unfortunately, we have no knowledge as to how the vast and varied phenotype of this disorder correlates to any particular genotype. This has been topic of several studies, none of which have provided solid evidence for any reproducible genetic abnormality.The variable phenotype of the disease mimics a multi gene inheritance, with certain individuals perhaps having only one mutations or one genetic abnormality and present with one or very few keloid lesions, to those who have inherited two or more genetic mutations, whereby the disease appears in its most severe form. An analogy can be made to thalassemia, whereby various phenotypes; thalassemia traits, minor, inter-media and major; are linked to various genetic abnormalities involving two sets of alleles for alpha and beta globin genes and numerous genetic abnormalities of the two distinct genes(10, 11). Much like thalassemia, keloid disorder with its clinical phenotype varying from almost asymptomatic to sever and very massive skin involvement, may indeed be a constellation of several monogenic conditions, each resulting in a particular phenotype. Much work needs to be done to better understand the genetic of this fascinating disorder.
The pathogenesis of keloid disorder is for most part unknown and poorly understood. Culprit in formation of keloid lesion is the wounding of the skin in genetically prone individual.Disruption in the normal anatomy of the skin and subsequent genetically driven dysregulated wound healing, leads to formation of keloid lesions. Wound healing is a very complex and dynamic process that normally results in the restoration of anatomical continuity and function of the skin. Four distinct, yet overlapping phases of wound healing are hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodeling.A normal and balanced wound healing response results in minimal scar formation. Keloid formation on the other hand is due to uninhibited, excessive and protracted wound healing response to a dermal injury, as if the brakes in wound healing process are malfunctioning and the runaway car cannot stop. The result is excess fibroblast proliferation and collagen deposition that outgrows the original site of dermal injury.Worsening of earlobe keloids after surgical excision, is most probably due to triggering of the same dysregulated wound healing mechanisms, yet to a new dermal injury that is more extensive in nature, than the original triggering injury, for instance from the ear piercing.Another important factor in pathogenesis of keloid is age of onset of keloid, which peaks at puberty and early teens. It is therefore postulated that although the genetic predisposition is transmitted from parents to their children, in most cases, the actual disorder is not triggered until children reach puberty.Exception to this rule is development of keloids in very young children. Author reported development of bilateral earlobe keloids in a 9 months old girl, following piercing of her ears, at a pediatrician’s office. Very small case series (not published) shows development of earlobe keloids in young children, under age of 5, almost exclusively in black girls following earlobe piercing.The author has treated a 21 year old woman who developed right sided posterior earlobe keloid, may years after bilateral earlobe piercing, only after the earring she was wearing was ripped off her ear by an accidental force, resulting in a tear in her earlobe. Although she had both her ears pierced as a child, she only developed a keloid in the right ear after sustaining a new injury in her adult age.Lane reported that keloids are more likely to develop when ears are pierced after age 11 than before, even in patients with a family history of keloid. He recommended that patients with a family history of keloids should consider not having their ears pierced and if this is not an option, then piercing should be considered during early childhood, rather than later childhood.Although Lane’s conclusion holds true in great majority of patients, cases of keloid in children under age of 5 defies his proposed theory, and is a testament to the lack of our understanding of pathogenesis and genetics of keloid disorder.As to why there is such latency in development of earlobe keloids, some have suggested that development of keloids may be stimulated by various hormonal changes at puberty or during pregnancy.In addition to wounding of the skin in predisposed individuals; there must exist other factors that contribute to development of ear keloids. In his 1979 article, Pierce  raised a valid question as to why some patients with bilateral earlobe piecing only develop unilateral earlobe keloids. Thirty years later, we still don’t have answer to this probing question.Analysis of our own data (unpublished data from Park et al.) from Korea, where practice of earlobe piecing is almost always bilateral, showed that among 580 patients with earlobe keloids, 279 (48.1%) had presented with unilateral earlobe keloids and 301 (51.9%) had unilateral keloids.We can only assume that one ear suffers from a unique post piercing complication and develops a keloid, and the other ear is spared this complication. Could it be local infection in one ear? Certainly some patients report this as the culprit to development of keloid. Could it be unequal tissue injury in the ears? Could it be sustaining a future injury to the earlobe as a result of wounding of one earlobe while the earring pin passes through the earlobe while wearing the earring? We can hypothesize about many other causes. Which one is correct? More than thirty years later, we have not made any progress in answering this very basic question.A more plausible theory, based on clinical observation is that perhaps, if we had a method to map the distribution pattern of the genetic abnormality in keloid patients, each patient’s skin will map differently. It is therefore possible, that in genetically predisposed patients, certain parts of their skin, upon infliction of an injury, will develop a keloid, while other parts of skin may not. Image below clearly shows that in this particular patient, the wound healing process in the midline of abdomen, did heal well and is free of keloid or even hypertrophic scarring. On the other hand, she developed a keloid at the site of piecing of her navel, supporting the theory that although she is prone to develop keloids, not all of her skin will form keloids.
Triggering factor for great majority of keloid patients is the wounding of the skin, which is inflicted in many different ways. It is however, against the backdrop of genetic susceptibility of the individual that a keloid forms at the site of skin injury.Ear piercing is by far the leading cause of earlobe keloid formation in predisposed individuals. Ear piercing is a widespread practice, commonly performed by non-medical personnel in jewelry shops, stores and malls. Parents often choose to have their daughter’s earlobes be pierced at very early ages. Practice of ear piercing has never been subject of a scientific research.Acne is perhaps the second most common triggering factor for development of keloid in genetically prone individuals. Acne induced keloids are often seen in the face, shoulders and the chest area.Surgery and simple skin wounds from accidents can lead to keloid formation. Keloid patients, and those with a family history of keloid disorder should avoid undergoing esthetic surgery of any sort, simply because development and treatment of keloidal lesions that develop after a face lift, or after breast augmentation, is a daunting task.Vaccination with BCG [BCG] often leads to keloid formation at the site of vaccination.Chicken pox, and other inflammatory skin condition can also trigger keloid formation.Tattooing and Piercing practices often results in keloid formation in genetically prone individuals.
Age of Onset
Age of onset of keloid disorder has never been systematically studied. Our current understanding of the age of onset and age distribution of keloid disorder is solely based on observation or citations of very old literature, or studies that have had aims other than studying the true age of onset of keloid disorder. While studying genetics of keloid disorder, Clark et. al. studied 5 families with total of 35 affected individuals with various phenotypes and distribution of keloidal lesions. Age of onset of keloid disorder was obtained by taking history from the study subjects. The age reported for first keloid development varied from 5 to 52 years, although most subjects examined (50%) reported onset of their first keloid between 10 and 19 years. Similarly when individuals with multiple keloids were asked to recall onset age of each lesion, participants reported the largest number of keloids (46%) appearing between 10 and 19 years. An IRB approved online survey was launched in November 2011 by Dr. TIrgan to capture various detailed information directly from KD patients including the age at which the study participants would recall to have developed their very first keloidal lesion. As of May 11, 2014, 1,383 patients with keloid disorder had participated in this survey, among which 738 participants provided the age when they developed their first keloid. Parents and guardians comprised a very small proportion of respondents (<4%) answering the survey on behalf of their underage children. Individuals from various countries with access to internet participated in this survey.Analysis of this data revealed that the age of onset of keloid disorder for great majority (approximately 82%) of patients is between 5 and 25, with 54.6 % of patients being diagnosed before age of 18; establishing keloid disorder as one of the most common chronic cutaneous childhood disorders. Additionally, subset analysis of our data revealed a strong correlation between the age of onset and pattern of distribution of keloid disorder with shoulder, upper arm, and ear and earlobe keloids to present at a much younger age as opposed to keloids in other regions.Article authored by Dr. Michael H. Tirgan, MD